DMCA Policy

1. Introduction

GreatLibrary.AI ("we," "us," "our"), operated by Alexandria AI Systems, respects the intellectual property rights of others and expects our users to do the same. In accordance with the Digital Millennium Copyright Act of 1998 ("DMCA," codified at 17 U.S.C. Section 512), we respond expeditiously to claims of copyright infringement committed using our Service.

This policy explains how to report copyright infringement on our platform, how we process and respond to such claims, and the rights available to affected users throughout the process.

2. Our Role as a Service Provider

GreatLibrary.AI operates as an online service provider under Section 512 of the DMCA. We provide tools for users to create and generate content using AI technology. We do not control or monitor all content created by users but will respond to valid DMCA notices.

2.1 Safe Harbor Compliance

As a service provider, we qualify for the safe harbor provisions of Section 512(c) of the DMCA. To maintain this protection, we:

• Have designated an agent with the U.S. Copyright Office to receive notifications of claimed infringement (see Section 3.3 below)
• Implement and enforce a repeat infringer policy (see Section 6)
• Do not interfere with standard technical measures used by copyright owners to identify or protect copyrighted works
• Act expeditiously to remove or disable access to material upon receiving proper notification of infringement
• Do not have actual knowledge that material on our platform is infringing, and are not aware of facts or circumstances from which infringing activity is apparent

3. Reporting Copyright Infringement

If you believe that content on our Service infringes your copyright, please submit a DMCA takedown notice containing the following information:

3.1 Required Information for DMCA Notice

1. Physical or electronic signature of the copyright owner or authorized representative
2. Identification of the copyrighted work claimed to be infringed (or a representative list if multiple works)
3. Identification of the infringing material with sufficient information to locate it (URL or other specific location)
4. Your contact information: name, address, telephone number, and email address
5. A statement that you have a good faith belief that the use is not authorized by the copyright owner, its agent, or the law
6. A statement that the information in the notice is accurate, and under penalty of perjury, that you are authorized to act on behalf of the copyright owner

3.2 DMCA Notice Template

3.3 Where to Send DMCA Notices

Send your DMCA takedown notice to our designated agent:

• Designated DMCA Agent: Legal Department, Alexandria AI Systems
• Email: dmca@greatlibrary.ai
• Mailing Address: Alexandria AI Systems, Attn: DMCA Agent, Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates
• Subject Line: DMCA Takedown Notice
• Organization: Alexandria AI Systems
• Service Provider: GreatLibrary.AI (greatlibrary.ai / greatlibrary.ai / greatlibrary.app)

Our designated agent information is filed with the U.S. Copyright Office's DMCA Designated Agent Directory at copyright.gov/dmca-directory. Service providers are required to maintain current designated agent information with the Copyright Office to qualify for the safe harbor provisions of Section 512(c).

4. How We Process DMCA Notices

Upon receiving a valid DMCA notice, we will follow this process with the specified timelines:

1. Acknowledge receipt within 2 business days via email to the complainant
2. Review the notice for completeness and validity within 3 business days
3. Remove or disable access to the allegedly infringing material expeditiously, typically within 1-3 business days of validation
4. Notify the user who posted the content about the takedown, including the reason and the complainant's identity (as required by the DMCA)
5. Provide the user with information about filing a counter-notification and the applicable timeline
6. Maintain records of all DMCA notices, counter-notifications, and actions taken for a minimum of 3 years

If a notice is incomplete or defective, we will notify the complainant within 3 business days and specify what additional information is required.

4a. DMCA Process Timeline

The following timeline illustrates the complete lifecycle of a DMCA takedown and counter-notification process, from initial notice through potential content restoration.

Note: All timelines are measured in business days. Weekends and public holidays are excluded. Emergency takedowns for clearly illegal content (such as CSAM) may be processed in less than 24 hours.

5. Counter-Notification

If you believe your content was removed by mistake or misidentification, you may submit a counter-notification.

5.1 Required Information for Counter-Notification

1. Your physical or electronic signature
2. Identification of the material that was removed and its location before removal
3. A statement under penalty of perjury that you have a good faith belief the material was removed due to mistake or misidentification
4. Your name, address, and telephone number
5. A statement that you consent to the jurisdiction of the federal district court for your address (or if outside the US, any judicial district where GreatLibrary.AI may be found)
6. A statement that you will accept service of process from the person who filed the original DMCA notice

5.2 Counter-Notification Template

5.3 Counter-Notification Process

Send your counter-notification to: dmca@greatlibrary.ai

Upon receiving a valid counter-notification, we will:

1. Promptly provide a copy to the original complainant (within 2 business days)
2. Inform the original complainant that we will restore the content in 10-14 business days unless they file a court action
3. Restore the content after the 10-14 business day waiting period unless the complainant files a court action seeking a restraining order against the content provider
4. Notify the content provider when their material has been restored

5.4 Counter-Notification FAQ

The following frequently asked questions address common concerns about the counter-notification process.

Frequently asked questions about the counter-notification process

Question	Answer
Do I need a lawyer to file a counter-notification?	No, but we strongly recommend consulting one. A counter-notification is filed under penalty of perjury and has legal consequences. We provide a template (Section 5.2) to help you include all required elements.
What happens to my content during the waiting period?	Your content remains removed from public access during the 10-14 business day waiting period after we forward your counter-notification to the complainant. You retain access to the content in your private account and may export it.
What if the complainant files a court action?	If the complainant files a federal court action seeking a restraining order within the waiting period, we will not restore the content until the court proceedings are resolved. We will notify you immediately if this occurs.
Can a counter-notification remove a strike from my record?	Yes. If your counter-notification is valid and the complainant does not file a court action within the statutory period, the associated strike is removed from your account (see Section 6.4).
Is my personal information shared with the complainant?	The DMCA requires us to forward your counter-notification (including your name and contact information) to the original complainant. We share only the information required by statute and handle all data per our Privacy Policy.
Can I file a counter-notification for AI-generated content?	Yes, the same process applies. However, the legal status of AI-generated content may affect the merits of your claim. See Section 7 for guidance on AI content and copyright.

6. Repeat Infringer Policy

In accordance with the DMCA, we maintain a policy to terminate, in appropriate circumstances, the accounts of users who are repeat infringers. This three-strike policy is designed to balance proportional enforcement with the protection of copyright holders' rights.

6.1 What Constitutes a Repeat Infringer

• Users who receive three (3) or more valid DMCA notices within a rolling 12-month period
• Users who receive notices for particularly egregious infringement (e.g., reproducing entire copyrighted works verbatim)
• Users who repeatedly upload content previously removed for infringement (re-upload after takedown)

Notice validity: Only DMCA notices that are complete, properly sworn, and not successfully countered by a counter-notification count toward the three-strike threshold. If you file a valid counter-notification and the complainant does not initiate legal proceedings within the statutory period, the associated strike is removed from your record.

6.2 Three-Strike Escalation Policy

Our repeat infringer policy follows a clear, progressive escalation:

Three-strike escalation process for repeat copyright infringers

Strike	Action Taken	User Notification	Appeal Window
1st Offense	Infringing content removed. Written warning issued. Strike recorded on account.	Email notification within 24 hours with details of the complaint, the removed content, and instructions for filing a counter-notification if you believe the removal was in error.	Counter-notification may be filed at any time. Warning remains on record for 12 months.
2nd Offense	Infringing content removed. Second written warning. Account temporarily suspended for 7 days. Publishing privileges restricted for 30 days after reinstatement.	Email notification with details, explanation of suspension, and explicit warning that a third strike results in permanent termination.	Counter-notification may be filed during suspension. If successful, suspension is lifted early and the strike is removed.
3rd Offense	All infringing content removed. Account permanently terminated. No refund of subscription fees. All published content removed from the public library and storefront.	Email notification with details and instructions for data export (14-day window) and termination appeal process.	You may appeal within 14 days to appeals@greatlibrary.ai. Account remains terminated during appeal review.

6.3 Aggravating and Mitigating Factors

We may adjust the enforcement response based on the following factors:

• Aggravating factors (may accelerate enforcement): Commercial-scale infringement, re-uploading previously removed content, circumventing technical protection measures, identity fraud in counter-notifications
• Mitigating factors (may reduce severity): Good faith belief in fair use, prompt voluntary removal upon notification, first-time use of the platform, cooperation with the investigation

Egregious infringement: In cases of particularly severe infringement (such as systematic copying of entire copyrighted works for commercial resale), we reserve the right to skip directly to account termination regardless of prior strike count.

6.4 Strike Expiration and Record Keeping

• Strikes expire after 12 months from the date of the valid DMCA notice, provided no new strikes are received during that period
• If a counter-notification is successfully resolved in your favor (no legal action filed within statutory period), the associated strike is removed immediately
• We maintain records of all DMCA notices, counter-notifications, and enforcement actions for a minimum of 3 years for legal compliance purposes
• You may request a summary of your current strike status by emailing dmca@greatlibrary.ai

6.5 Reinstatement After Termination

Users whose accounts have been permanently terminated under the repeat infringer policy may apply for reinstatement under the following conditions:

Conditions required for account reinstatement after termination for repeat infringement

Requirement	Details
Waiting period	A minimum of 6 months must have elapsed since the date of account termination
Resolution of underlying claims	All DMCA notices that led to termination must have been resolved -- either through counter-notification (with no court action filed), settlement with the complainant, or court resolution in the user's favor
Written application	Submit a written reinstatement request to appeals@greatlibrary.ai explaining the circumstances, the resolution of each strike, and a commitment to comply with copyright law and our Terms of Service
Review	Reinstatement decisions are made at our sole discretion by a review panel that includes at least one person who was not involved in the original termination decision
Probationary period	If reinstated, the account will be placed on a 12-month probationary period during which a single valid DMCA notice will result in immediate permanent termination without further appeal
No guarantee	Reinstatement is not guaranteed. Users terminated for egregious infringement (systematic commercial copying, identity fraud in counter-notifications) are permanently ineligible for reinstatement

7. AI-Generated Content and Copyright

Users should be aware that:

• AI systems may generate content that inadvertently resembles existing copyrighted works
• The legal status of AI-generated content regarding copyright is evolving
• Users are responsible for reviewing all AI-generated content before publication
• We cannot guarantee that AI-generated content does not infringe third-party rights
• Users indemnify GreatLibrary.AI against claims arising from their use of AI-generated content

If you believe AI-generated content on our platform infringes your copyright, please follow the same DMCA notice procedures outlined above.

7.1 Current Legal Landscape for AI-Generated Content

The copyright status of AI-generated content varies by jurisdiction and is subject to ongoing legal developments:

Copyright status of AI-generated content across major jurisdictions

Jurisdiction	Current Position (as of April 2026)	Implication for Users
United States	The U.S. Copyright Office has stated that purely AI-generated content without human authorship is not copyrightable. Content with substantial human creative input may qualify.	Users who substantially edit, curate, and arrange AI-generated text may claim copyright on the resulting work. Unedited AI output alone may not be protectable.
European Union	EU copyright law requires an "author's own intellectual creation." Pure AI output without human creative choices may not meet this threshold.	Similar to US position. Significant human involvement in selection and arrangement strengthens copyright claims.
United Kingdom	The UK Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988 (s.9(3)) provides for copyright in computer-generated works, with the author being "the person by whom the arrangements necessary for the creation of the work are undertaken."	UK users may have stronger copyright claims over AI-generated content compared to some other jurisdictions.

Disclaimer: This table is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. Copyright law regarding AI-generated content is actively evolving. We recommend consulting a qualified intellectual property attorney for guidance specific to your situation.

7.2 User Best Practices for AI Content Copyright

To strengthen your copyright position when using AI-generated content:

• Exercise creative judgment: Make substantial creative decisions about content selection, editing, arrangement, and presentation
• Document your process: Keep records of your prompts, editing decisions, and creative contributions to demonstrate human authorship
• Review and revise: Significantly edit and refine AI-generated text rather than publishing raw output
• Add original elements: Include your own original writing, analysis, or commentary alongside AI-generated material
• Verify uniqueness: Check that your content does not substantially reproduce existing copyrighted works before publication

8. Good Faith and Abuse Prevention

The DMCA notice and takedown process is a powerful tool for protecting copyright holders, but it can also be misused. We take both copyright protection and abuse prevention seriously.

We reserve the right to:

• Reject incomplete or defective DMCA notices
• Reject notices that appear to be submitted in bad faith
• Seek damages from parties who submit false notices under Section 512(f)
• Report abuse of the DMCA process to appropriate authorities
• Implement technical measures to detect and prevent repeated bad-faith filings

8.0a Section 512(f) Penalties for Knowingly False Notices

This means that if you file a DMCA notice claiming ownership of content you do not own, or file a counter-notification falsely claiming non-infringement:

• Monetary liability: You may be required to pay the other party's actual damages, lost profits, costs of defense, and attorneys' fees. In notable cases, courts have awarded damages exceeding $100,000 for knowingly false DMCA notices
• Perjury exposure: DMCA notices require a statement under penalty of perjury that you are the copyright owner or authorized to act on behalf of the owner. Knowingly false statements under penalty of perjury may expose you to criminal liability under 18 U.S.C. Section 1621
• Platform consequences: We will permanently ban any individual or entity that files knowingly false DMCA notices from using our reporting system. Repeat bad-faith filers will be reported to the appropriate legal authorities
• Tortious interference: False DMCA takedowns that disrupt a legitimate creator's ability to publish and sell their work may also give rise to claims for tortious interference with business relationships

Before you file: We strongly encourage all DMCA notice filers to carefully verify that they are the actual copyright owner (or authorized representative) and that the accused material genuinely infringes their copyright. If you are unsure whether the use constitutes infringement, consider whether fair use or another exception may apply, and consult a qualified attorney before filing.

8.1 Common DMCA Abuse Patterns

The following patterns may indicate bad faith use of the DMCA process and may result in rejection of a notice:

• Competitor suppression: Filing notices against competitors' original content to gain commercial advantage
• Automated mass filings: Submitting large volumes of notices without human review of each claim
• Censorship: Using DMCA notices to suppress criticism, reviews, or commentary that constitutes fair use
• Identity fraud: Filing notices impersonating the actual copyright holder

Users who receive a DMCA notice they believe to be abusive should file a counter-notification and may also report the abuse to abuse@greatlibrary.ai.

8a. Transparency Reporting

In the interest of transparency and to comply with the EU Digital Services Act (DSA), we publish the following information about our copyright enforcement activities:

• Annual transparency report: We will publish an annual report summarizing the number of DMCA notices received, the number of takedowns executed, the number of counter-notifications received, and the number of content restorations
• Response time metrics: Average time from receipt of a valid notice to takedown action
• Rejection rate: Percentage of notices rejected for deficiency or bad faith

Transparency reports will be published on our website and made available upon request to regulatory authorities. The first report will cover the period from the Service launch through December 2026.

8b. Fair Use Considerations

When evaluating DMCA notices, we consider whether the reported content may constitute fair use under Section 107 of the US Copyright Act. Fair use is a legal doctrine that permits limited use of copyrighted material without permission from the copyright holder for purposes such as:

• Commentary and criticism: Quoting portions of a work for the purpose of commentary, review, or criticism
• Education and scholarship: Using excerpts for teaching, research, or academic analysis
• Parody and satire: Transformative works that comment on or critique the original
• News reporting: Using excerpts for the purpose of reporting current events

Fair use analysis considers four factors set forth in 17 U.S.C. Section 107:

1. The purpose and character of the use (including whether it is commercial or for nonprofit educational purposes and whether the use is transformative)
2. The nature of the copyrighted work
3. The amount and substantiality of the portion used in relation to the copyrighted work as a whole
4. The effect of the use upon the potential market for or value of the copyrighted work

If we determine that reported content may constitute fair use, we may decline to take down the content and will inform the complainant of our reasoning. Similarly, if you receive a DMCA notice and believe your use is protected by fair use, you should include this argument in your counter-notification.

Note: Fair use is a fact-specific legal analysis. We cannot provide legal advice on whether any particular use qualifies as fair use. We recommend consulting with a qualified intellectual property attorney for specific guidance.

9. International Copyright

While this policy is based primarily on the United States Digital Millennium Copyright Act, we respect copyright laws worldwide. If you are located outside the United States:

• We will consider copyright infringement claims filed under the laws of your jurisdiction
• We follow the notice-and-takedown procedures outlined above as a baseline standard
• EU users may also reference the EU Copyright Directive (Directive 2019/790) when filing claims
• UK users may reference the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988
• We aim to respond to all valid copyright claims regardless of the claimant's country of origin

For international claims, please include the relevant copyright law your claim is based on when sending your notice to dmca@greatlibrary.ai.

9.1 EU Copyright Directive (Directive 2019/790)

For users and rights holders in the European Union, we comply with the EU Copyright Directive, including:

• Article 17 (Online Content-Sharing): As a platform that hosts user-generated content, we implement measures to prevent unauthorized works from being made available. We process takedown requests promptly and provide a complaint and redress mechanism
• Article 15 (Press Publishers' Rights): We do not reproduce press publications beyond what is permitted for individual words or very short extracts. AI-generated content does not incorporate third-party press content without licensing
• Articles 3-4 (Text and Data Mining): Rights holders may opt out of text and data mining by expressing their reservation of rights. We honor opt-out signals in robots.txt and metadata
• Complaint mechanism: EU users whose content is removed may file a complaint through our appeals process (see Section 5 for counter-notifications). Complaints are reviewed by a human within 15 business days

9.2 UK Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988

• UK rights holders may file copyright infringement claims referencing the CDPA 1988
• We treat UK takedown requests with the same urgency and process as DMCA notices
• The UK recognizes computer-generated works as having the author be "the person by whom the arrangements necessary for the creation of the work are undertaken" (Section 9(3) CDPA). This may be relevant for AI-generated content created on our platform

9.3 Berne Convention and International Treaties

We operate in accordance with the principles of the Berne Convention for the Protection of Literary and Artistic Works, which establishes that copyright protection is automatic and does not require registration. We recognize copyright claims from all Berne Convention signatory countries (currently 181 countries).

9a. AI Content Ownership FAQ

AI-generated content raises novel copyright questions. Below are answers to the most common questions we receive.

Q: Do I own the copyright to AI-generated content I create on GreatLibrary.AI?

A: This depends on your jurisdiction and the degree of human creative input. In most jurisdictions, purely AI-generated output (with no significant human creative contribution) may not be eligible for copyright protection. However, if you provide substantial creative direction, select and arrange the output, or edit the generated text significantly, the resulting work may qualify for copyright protection in many jurisdictions. We recommend consulting a legal professional in your jurisdiction for specific advice.

Q: Can I sell AI-generated ebooks on the storefront?

A: Yes. You may sell AI-assisted content on our storefront regardless of its copyright status. However, you must comply with our Acceptable Use Policy, including accurate disclosure requirements. Note that content without copyright protection may be freely copied by others, which could affect its commercial value.

Q: Can someone file a DMCA takedown against my AI-generated content?

A: Yes, if a rights holder believes your AI-generated content infringes their existing copyrighted work. AI models are trained on large datasets, and there is a small possibility that generated output may closely resemble existing copyrighted material. If you receive a takedown notice, you may file a counter-notification if you believe the claim is invalid (see Section 5).

Q: Does OpenAI (or the AI provider) own the content generated through GreatLibrary.AI?

A: No. Under OpenAI's Terms of Use for API users, OpenAI assigns to the user all its right, title, and interest in API output. This means that to the extent OpenAI has any rights in the generated content, those rights are transferred to you through our use of the API.

Q: What if my AI-generated content accidentally resembles someone else's work?

A: We recommend reviewing your AI-generated content before publication, particularly if it concerns well-known works, characters, or brands. If you receive a copyright claim, our counter-notification process (Section 5) allows you to respond. We also recommend using plagiarism detection tools on important publications.

Q: How is AI-generated cover art treated under copyright law?

A: The US Copyright Office has indicated that images generated entirely by AI without human authorship are not copyrightable. However, if you use our cover editor to substantially modify, arrange, or add original elements to AI-generated art, the resulting composite work may contain copyrightable elements. EU and UK positions may differ; consult local legal counsel.

9b. DMCA Notice Submission Form

Use the template below to submit a DMCA takedown notice. Copy this template, fill in the required fields, and send it to dmca@greatlibrary.ai.

9c. Safe Harbor Statement

GreatLibrary.AI operates as an online service provider under Section 512 of the Digital Millennium Copyright Act (17 U.S.C. Section 512). As such, we qualify for safe harbor protection from liability for copyright infringement by our users, provided we meet the following conditions, which we maintain:

• Designated DMCA Agent: We have designated a DMCA agent to receive notifications of claimed infringement. Our agent's contact information is published above (Section 12) and registered with the U.S. Copyright Office
• Expeditious removal: Upon receiving a valid DMCA notification, we expeditiously remove or disable access to the allegedly infringing material
• No actual knowledge: We do not have actual knowledge that material on our platform is infringing, nor are we aware of facts or circumstances from which infringing activity is apparent. When we become aware of such, we act expeditiously
• No financial benefit: We do not receive a financial benefit directly attributable to the infringing activity in cases where we have the right and ability to control such activity
• Repeat infringer policy: We have adopted and reasonably implemented a policy that provides for the termination of repeat infringers (see Section 6)
• Standard technical measures: We accommodate and do not interfere with standard technical measures used by copyright owners to identify or protect copyrighted works

EU equivalent: Under the EU E-Commerce Directive (2000/31/EC) Article 14, we operate as a hosting service provider and are not liable for stored information provided we have no actual knowledge of illegal activity and act expeditiously upon obtaining such knowledge.

9c.1 Safe Harbor Technical Compliance Measures

To maintain our eligibility for safe harbor protection under Section 512, we implement the following technical and organizational measures:

Technical measures implementing each Section 512 safe harbor requirement

Requirement	Section 512 Reference	Our Implementation
Designated agent registration	512(c)(2)	Agent registered with U.S. Copyright Office DMCA Designated Agent Directory. Contact details published on this page (Section 12.1) and on our website
Repeat infringer policy	512(i)(1)(A)	Three-strike policy adopted and reasonably implemented (Section 6). Policy communicated to all users via Terms of Service
Standard technical measures	512(i)(1)(B)	We accommodate and do not interfere with standard technical measures used by copyright owners to identify or protect copyrighted works, including digital watermarks, content fingerprinting, and rights management information
Expeditious takedown	512(c)(1)(C)	Automated intake system routes DMCA notices to the designated agent immediately. Validated notices result in content removal within 1-3 business days (see Section 9d)
No financial benefit from infringement	512(c)(1)(B)	We do not monetize infringing content. Subscription fees are for platform access, not tied to specific content. Storefront revenue from infringing content is not distributed to sellers
Counter-notification procedures	512(g)(2)-(3)	Counter-notification template provided (Section 5.2). We forward counter-notifications to complainants within 2 business days. Content restored after 10-14 business days unless court action is filed
No actual knowledge	512(c)(1)(A)	We do not pre-screen or review user-generated content for copyright infringement. We act on knowledge obtained through valid DMCA notices

Compliance audit: We conduct an annual internal review of our safe harbor compliance measures to ensure continued eligibility. The most recent review was completed in April 2026.

9d. DMCA Response Time Commitments

We commit to the following response timelines for DMCA-related actions. These commitments apply to all notices and counter-notifications received at dmca@greatlibrary.ai.

Response time commitments for DMCA notice processing stages

Action	Commitment	Statutory Requirement
Acknowledge receipt of notice	Within 2 business days	No statutory deadline, but industry best practice
Review notice for completeness	Within 3 business days	Must be "expeditious" per Section 512(c)(1)(C)
Remove/disable infringing material	Within 1-3 business days of validation	"Expeditious" removal per Section 512(c)(1)(C)
Notify affected user of takedown	Within 1 business day of removal	Required per Section 512(g)(2)(A)
Process counter-notification	Within 3 business days of receipt	Must forward to original complainant "promptly"
Restore content after counter-notification	10-14 business days after forwarding	Required per Section 512(g)(2)(C) unless court action filed
Emergency takedown (CSAM, clear illegality)	Within 4 hours	Platform obligation under applicable law

Measurement: Business days are Monday through Friday, excluding US federal holidays. Notices received outside of business hours are treated as received on the next business day for timeline purposes.

9e. Rights of Affected Users During DMCA Proceedings

If your content is subject to a DMCA takedown, you retain the following rights throughout the proceedings:

• Right to notification: You will be notified in writing (via the email associated with your account) within 2 business days of any content removal, including the specific content affected, the reason for removal, and the identity of the complainant as required by the DMCA
• Right to counter-notify: You may file a counter-notification (see Section 5) if you believe the takedown was issued in error. We provide a template and clear instructions to make this process accessible
• Right to data access: A DMCA takedown does not affect your ability to access your account, other ebooks, or personal data. Only the specifically identified content is removed from public access
• Right to data export: You retain the right to export your data (including taken-down content for your personal records) via your Account Settings throughout the proceedings
• Right to legal counsel: You have the right to consult with an attorney before responding. We will not penalize you for seeking legal advice or for the time taken to do so within the counter-notification window
• No automatic account penalty: A single DMCA takedown does not result in automatic account suspension. Account-level actions only occur under our repeat infringer policy (see Section 6)
• Privacy during proceedings: Your personal information shared during DMCA proceedings is handled in accordance with our Privacy Policy. We share only the minimum information required by law with the complainant
• Presumption of good faith: We do not presume that a DMCA notice is valid. We review each notice for completeness and plausibility before taking action, and we recognize that DMCA takedown notices can be filed in error or in bad faith
• Data retention and deletion: Content removed under a DMCA takedown is retained in our systems for the duration required to process the notice and any counter-notification (typically up to 90 days after final resolution). After resolution, you may request permanent deletion of the removed content by emailing dmca@greatlibrary.ai. We will confirm deletion within 10 business days

9e.1 Procedural Fairness Commitment

We are committed to procedural fairness in all DMCA proceedings. In accordance with the principles of due process and the EU Digital Services Act (DSA) Article 17, we ensure:

• Proportionality: Content removal is limited to the specific material identified in the DMCA notice. We do not remove entire accounts, unrelated ebooks, or other content based on a single takedown notice unless required by law
• Timeliness: We adhere to the response time commitments in Section 9d and communicate clearly at each stage of the process
• Statement of reasons: Every content removal action is accompanied by a clear written explanation identifying the specific content removed, the legal basis for removal, the identity of the complainant (as required by the DMCA), and instructions for filing a counter-notification
• No bias: DMCA notices are reviewed impartially without regard to the identity or status of the complainant or the content provider. We apply the same standards to all notices regardless of the parties involved
• Record keeping: We maintain complete records of all DMCA notices, counter-notifications, and actions taken for a minimum of 3 years, enabling transparency reporting and audit

EU DSA users: If you are located in the EU, you additionally have the right to refer a dispute arising from a content removal decision to a certified out-of-court dispute settlement body under DSA Article 21, or to lodge a complaint with the Digital Services Coordinator in your member state.

10. Modifications to This Policy

We may update this DMCA Policy from time to time to reflect changes in law, platform capabilities, or enforcement practices. When we make material changes, we will update the "Last updated" date at the top of this page, add an entry to the Version History (Section 13), and notify affected users where required by law. Continued use of the Service after changes constitutes acceptance of the updated policy.

How to stay informed: We recommend bookmarking this page and checking the version number periodically. Material changes that affect your rights will also be communicated via email to registered users.

11. Accessibility of This Policy

We are committed to ensuring this DMCA Policy is accessible to all users, in accordance with WCAG 2.1 Level AA guidelines. This page includes:

• Keyboard-navigable table of contents and section links (Tab and Enter keys navigate all interactive elements)
• Screen reader-compatible semantic structure with descriptive headings and ARIA labels on all interactive elements
• A printable version optimized for readability, with link URLs expanded in print
• An email option to share this policy with legal counsel
• High contrast mode support for users with visual impairments
• Reduced motion support for users who prefer minimal animations
• Responsive design that reflows content at any zoom level up to 400% without horizontal scrolling

The DMCA notice and counter-notification templates above are provided in a format that can be copied as plain text for use in email clients, word processors, or other tools. If you require assistance submitting a notice due to a disability, contact accessibility@greatlibrary.ai and we will provide reasonable accommodations, including accepting notices by phone or through an alternative format.

If you require this policy in an alternative format (such as large print, Braille, or audio), please contact accessibility@greatlibrary.ai and we will make reasonable efforts to accommodate your request.

12. Contact Information

12.1 Designated DMCA Agent (17 U.S.C. Section 512(c)(2))

The following agent has been designated to receive notifications of claimed copyright infringement under the DMCA. This information is filed with the U.S. Copyright Office DMCA Designated Agent Directory.

Under 17 U.S.C. Section 512(c)(2), service providers must designate an agent to receive DMCA notifications and make the agent's contact information available through their service and through the Copyright Office. We update our designation with the Copyright Office whenever our agent information changes.

12.2 Other Contacts

• Legal Department: legal@greatlibrary.ai (non-DMCA legal inquiries, licensing questions, partnership agreements)
• Abuse Reports: abuse@greatlibrary.ai (content that violates our Acceptable Use Policy but is not a copyright matter)
• General Support: support@greatlibrary.ai (account issues, technical questions)
• Appeals: appeals@greatlibrary.ai (appeal an enforcement action or DMCA takedown decision)

Company: Alexandria AI Systems

For related policies, see our Terms of Service (content ownership and intellectual property), Privacy Policy (data handling during DMCA proceedings), Acceptable Use Policy (content standards and prohibited content), and Cookie Policy.

13. Version History

We maintain a record of material changes to this DMCA Policy for transparency:

Version history showing date and summary of changes for each revision

Version	Date	Summary of Changes
2.6	May 2, 2026	Accessibility (WCAG 2.4.7): added focus-visible outline styles to print button, action-link (email), and changelog toggle buttons. Keyboard-only users can now see a visible 3px blue focus ring when tabbing through these interactive elements, matching the focus styles already present on navigation links and legal content links
2.5	May 1, 2026	Final compliance round: updated effective date and review badge to May 1, 2026. Verified DMCA designated agent contact information is current and complete per 17 U.S.C. Section 512(c)(2). Confirmed takedown and counter-notification procedures remain accurate
2.3	April 23, 2026	Copy quality review: clarified legal terminology for plain-language readability, added explicit data retention and deletion guidance to Section 9e (Rights of Affected Users), tightened procedural language throughout, updated review dates
2.2	April 15, 2026	Final compliance review: synchronized review badge date, verified designated agent details are complete and correctly formatted per 17 U.S.C. Section 512(c)(2), confirmed counter-notification process is clear and actionable with template and FAQ
2.1	April 15, 2026	Added accessible table captions (sr-only) to 5 tables for WCAG 1.3.1 compliance. Updated version badge to v2.1
2.0	April 15, 2026	Added Counter-Notification FAQ (5.4) with 6 common questions covering lawyer requirement, content status during waiting period, court action consequences, strike removal, personal information sharing, and AI-generated content counter-notifications. Added Reinstatement After Termination section (6.5) with 6-condition table covering waiting period (6 months), claim resolution, written application, independent review panel, probationary period (12 months), and egregious infringement exclusion. Added Safe Harbor Technical Compliance Measures (9c.1) with 7-row table mapping each Section 512 requirement to our specific implementation, plus annual compliance audit commitment
1.9	April 15, 2026	Restructured Contact Information (Section 12) with formally structured Designated DMCA Agent card (12.1) meeting 17 U.S.C. Section 512(c)(2) formatting requirements, including full legal name, title, organization, mailing address, email, service provider domains, and Copyright Office directory link. Separated other contacts (12.2) with distinct channels for legal, abuse, support, and appeals inquiries
1.8	April 15, 2026	Added physical mailing address to designated agent contact (Section 3.3) for DMCA Section 512(c)(2) compliance. Enhanced contact information (Section 12) with legal department email and mailing address. Added cross-references to Terms of Service, Privacy Policy, Acceptable Use Policy, and Cookie Policy in contact section and closing reference box
1.7	April 15, 2026	Added DMCA Response Time Commitments section (9d) with 7-row table documenting specific timelines for notice acknowledgment (2 days), completeness review (3 days), material removal (1-3 days), user notification (1 day), counter-notification processing (3 days), content restoration (10-14 days), and emergency takedown (4 hours). Added statutory requirement references per Section 512(c)(1)(C) and 512(g)(2)
1.6	April 15, 2026	Enhanced Repeat Infringer Policy (6) with detailed three-strike escalation table (6.2) documenting action, notification, and appeal window per strike level. Added aggravating and mitigating factors (6.3), strike expiration rules (6.4) with 12-month rolling window and counter-notification strike removal. Added Section 512(f) Penalties section (8.0a) with monetary liability disclosure ($100K+ case precedent), perjury exposure, platform consequences, and tortious interference warning
1.5	April 15, 2026	Added visual DMCA Process Timeline (4a) with 7-stage illustrated lifecycle from notice receipt through content restoration, color-coded stages (blue for process, red for removal, amber for counter-notification, green for resolution), and emergency takedown note
1.4	April 15, 2026	Expanded International Copyright (9) with EU Copyright Directive Article 17/15/3-4 compliance details, UK CDPA Section 9(3) AI authorship provision, and Berne Convention recognition for 181 signatory countries. Added AI Content Ownership FAQ (9a) with 6 questions covering ownership, selling, takedowns, provider rights, accidental resemblance, and cover art. Added DMCA Notice Submission Form (9b) with complete fillable template and Section 512(f) perjury warning. Added Safe Harbor Statement (9c) with Section 512 compliance documentation and EU E-Commerce Directive equivalent
1.3	April 15, 2026	Added AI copyright legal landscape table (7.1) with US/EU/UK jurisdiction comparison. Added user best practices for AI content copyright (7.2) with 5 actionable recommendations. Added DMCA abuse patterns (8.1) with examples of bad-faith filing. Added Transparency Reporting section (8a) with annual report commitment and DSA compliance. Enhanced Section 512(f) reference in Good Faith section
1.2	April 14, 2026	Added counter-notification template (5.2) with fill-in fields for affected users, expanded counter-notification process (5.3) with specific timelines and legal guidance, added notice about legal implications of counter-notification
1.1	April 9, 2026	Added accessibility of this policy section (11), version history (13), updated table of contents and section numbering
1.0	April 8, 2026	Initial DMCA Policy with safe harbor compliance, takedown procedures, counter-notification process, repeat infringer policy, and AI-generated content considerations

Previous versions of this DMCA Policy are available upon request by contacting legal@greatlibrary.ai.

13.1 Document Changelog

Select a version transition below to see a summary of what changed: